Key terms
\nPicture
\n\u2022 Multicultural society: The status of several different ethnic, racial, religious or cultural groups coexisting in harmony in the same society.
\n\u2022 Ethnic Segregation: Clustering together of people with similar ethnic or cultural characteristics into separate urban residential areas.
\nAsylum Seeker: Someone who has fled from his or her country to find a safe place elsewhere. Under the 1951 Convention of Refugees, an asylum applicant must be able to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution in his or her country of origin for reasons of political opinion, religion, ethnicity, race\/nationality, or membership of a particular social group.
\nReasons for the development of a multicultural society
\nPicture
\n\u2022 Multicultural societies are formed from migration. Below are some of the significant migrations into the UK over the last 200 years:<\/p>\n
\u2022 C19th: Jewish arrivals from Russia\/Poland escaping persecution
\n \u2022 C19th: Irish people escaping from poverty in rural Ireland
\n \u2022 1930s-40s: Jews and Poles escaping fascism and WW2
\n \u2022 1948-60s: Caribbean workers invited to rebuild postwar Britain, mainly in public services
\n \u2022 1950s-60s: Asians from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh escaping poverty and seeking work in public services and textile industries
\n \u2022 1970s: east African Asians (mainly from Uganda) escaping persecution and Vietnamese escaping war
\n \u2022 1980s-90s: eastern European refugees escaping from war and political unrest in Romania and former Yugoslavia
\n \u2022 1990 onwards: growth in asylum seekers applications (125,000 people were allowed to settle in the UK in 2000, of these people (45,000were from Africa)
\n\u2022 2000s: economic migration from Eastern Europe caused by the enlargement of the European Union, which enabled unrestricted migration by citizens of the new EU members in central and eastern Europe
\nPicture
\nPicture
\nMulticulturalism and the future
\n3 options or futures:
\n1. Ethnic groups integrate into wider society. They begin to influence the dominant culture of the country, the culture evolves over time and cultural fusion occurs. The so called melting pot idea. This process continues over time as new ethnic groups enter the country.
\n2. The ethnic groups integrate into society, they retain their own culture, whilst adopting, or some aspects of, the dominant culture of the country, people have multiple identities. The ethnic groups live alongside the indigenous population called cultural pluralism.
\n3. Ethnic groups do not integrate into wider society, they retain their own culture and reject the dominant culture. So called Balkanisation.
\nIssues related to multicultural societies
\nEconomic Issues
\n\u2013 There has been legislation on anti-racism, employment rights and equal opportunities to combat discrimination, prejudice and racism. Despite this, the cost of state benefits can cause resentment and racial intolerance.
\n\u2013 In 2002 it was calculated that the net tax contribution of migrants to the UK economy was \u00a32.5 billion per year and that a 1% population increase through migration can lead to a 1.25-1.5% increase in GDP (UK Home Office Statistics)
\n\u2013 Institute for Public Policy Research:
\n \u2022 Wide disparity in economic performance between and within nationalities
\n\u2013 Bangladesh-born people tend not to earn high incomes (less than \u00a3150 a week= low earners)
\n\u2013 Those from USA and Australia tend do well (\u00a3750 a week = high earners)
\n\u2013 \u2018Migrants are filling jobs that natives will not do\u2019 (The Economic and Fiscal Impact on Immigration). <\/p>\n
Housing
\n\u2013 Multiple occupancy of rented accommodation in inner-city areas is widespread
\n\u2013 Ethnic minorities have been less successful in securing mortgage loans, which means that they are forced to use less conventional and more expensive forms of finance. This limits what they are able to afford.
\n\u2013 Ethnic minorities have been discriminated against in access to local authority housing: \u2018rationalisation of residential space\u2019
\n\u2013 More recently owner occupancy has increased and some more wealthy individuals have moved into suburban areas
\n\u2013 Geographical segregation still present <\/p>\n
Education
\n \u2013 Educational requirements: provision of special English lessons and bilingual programmes for parents and children
\n\u2013 Holiday patterns, school timetables and school meals have been modified in some areas to reflect its ethnic mix.
\n\u2013 Variation in educational attainment of different ethnic minorities is still examined. There is some evidence to suggest:
\n\u2013 Children from Black and Caribbean backgrounds are underachieving compared with the white population and other ethnic groups
\n\u2013 Performance of children from Indian, Pakistan and Chinese backgrounds appears on average to be better than that of white children. Ofsted has stated that the white \u2018working class\u2019 male is currently the lowest achiever in schools. <\/p>\n
Healthcare
\n \u2013 A lack of resistance to childhood diseases among the children of newly arrived immigrants, and fears about immunisation.
\n\u2013 With increasing literacy and education along with literature on immunisation programmes concerns regarding immunisation are fewer
\n\u2013 Many ethnic minority groups tend to live in run-down inner-city areas, there remains a higher concentration of transmittable diseases. <\/p>\n
Language
\n\u2013 New migrants find it difficult to integrate and find a job if they do not speak English. This can be a particular problem for women, as they may be confined to the house and
\nimmediate locality by family commitments, religious or cultural beliefs.
\n\u2013 Second-generation migrant children, educated in the UK, grow up speaking English and may have different aspirations to their parents. They are more likely to integrate more fully, and this can cause tension if they adopt the culture of the host country. <\/p>\n
Religion
\n\u2013 Many migrants may follow a different religion from the host country, which may cause friction<\/p>\n
Other social issues
\n \u2013 Possible pressure on public services (health, education and social services)
\n\u2013 Immigrant groups are often welcomed by their host communities. They can be seen as a positive influence providing much-needed workers, but also having a positive and
\nrefreshing impact on diet, music, dress and language.
\n\u2013 Ethnic groups can become isolated from society around them and this can lead to mutual hostility between the communities. In the worst case this can lead to political and
\nreligious extremism (note that religious and civic groups from both communities work together to try and promote mutual understanding and reduce conflict). <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"